Vitamin D, part 2: Shannon's story

Re:Vitamin D, part 2: Shannon's story by fossuser on Monday August 24, 2020 @01:43PM (#24263194)

I wouldn't over index on that comment, I thought your blog post was effective.

Strictly scientific is appreciated, but I don't think it'll land as effectively with the audience that most needs to read this kind of thing in the first place.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Vitamin D, part 2: Shannon's story by devaboone on Monday August 24, 2020 @01:47PM (#24263259)

Thanks. It's hard to balance the strictly scientific with enough of the "softer" stuff to make it interesting for a wide audience.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Vitamin D, part 2: Shannon's story by KerryJones on Monday August 24, 2020 @01:53PM (#24263324)

I didn't say anything about strictly scientific. I think statistical/study-based + anecdotal is great.

[ Parent | on HN ]