News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Being OK with not being extraordinary by rjsw on Monday August 24, 2020 @01:12PM (#24262797)
There are not very many people with defined Erdős–Bacon numbers [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erd%C5%91s%E2%80%93Bacon_numbe...

Re:Being OK with not being extraordinary by framecowbird on Monday August 24, 2020 @01:19PM (#24262911)
> To have a defined Erdős–Bacon number, it is necessary to have both appeared in a film and co-authored an academic paper, although this in and of itself is not sufficient.

This surprised me. I guess you could star in a tiny indie film completely closed off from the Bacon graph...

Re:Being OK with not being extraordinary by read_if_gay_ on Monday August 24, 2020 @01:55PM (#24263343)
I imagine there would be one massive connected component and a large number of really tiny ones.
Re:Being OK with not being extraordinary by dmurray on Monday August 24, 2020 @01:47PM (#24263255)
Probably easier to co-author a paper with another novice author.
Re:Being OK with not being extraordinary by gvurrdon on Monday August 24, 2020 @02:09PM (#24263514)
Apparently there are sufficient (even I have one - 7 IIRC) that an even more exclusive club as been formed: https://rosschurchley.com/blog/who-else-has-an-erdos-bacon-s...