People who don't use Kali comment on whether move from one shell to another was right for the Kali users. This drive by commenting is sadly omnipresent in the open source world. OpenBSD uses CVS? They should use git. XServer? Why not Wayland? Oh, libsdl is using Mercurial, but they should totally use git. And on, and on.

Drive by comments are typically from people who want to sound like an expert.

I find it extremely amusing that your comment has been sufficiently downvoted that it's grey...

umm as a pen tester the move from bash to zsh was the most exciting thing about this update. w ^ to find the wfuzz command I did 2 days ago and didn't take notes on the output is useful as hell.

I believe that this is caused by the title originally being (something along the line of) "Kali Linux switches from bash to zsh".

I mean, anyone who cared was not waiting on the tool being shipped with kali linux to start using it. So including it is mostly a convenience thing .

I have to say this is the most disappointed I've been with a comment section in a while. Not that the comments are awful or in bad faith, it's just not got any of the topics I was hoping to read about.

As I mentioned elsewhere, this is because the original title was something like "Kali Linux switches from bash to zsh".

Agreed. If you don't have anything relevant to say just skip this link.

A classic example of bikeshedding.