> The Forest Service now admits that suppression backfired; excluding fire created an unnatural build-up of dry brush and overcrowding of trees that’s partly fueling today’s mega-fires.
In a fantasy book from 1998, the third book in the Circle of Magic quartet [0], a green mage gets extremely pissed off at a fire mage who between him and his father had been preventing forest fires for decades. By the end of the book, just such a "mega-fire" formed in the built-up dry material on the forest floor.
It kinda seems to me like this is a decently well-known effect that the government has been just been slow to acknowledge...
I think the problem is that with controlled fires, there is always a risk they could get out of control and burn down some properties, which will probably end the career of any politician who supported the decision/policy to not suppress that fire.
Suppressing fires is safer in the short run, while creating problems in the long run.
> Josh: Putting out fires isn't necessarily our policy?
> Sam: Fire's good for the environment under certain circumstances. Forests have a natural cycle that requires purging burns to reinvigorate growth.
> Josh: Someone just said that to you, right?[1]
[1] http://westwingwiki.com/2014/04/season-3-episode-3-ways-mean...