Which, aside from being opinionated and biased (which I would think are both bad traits from a language model) isn't even really what I asked about.
I suppose the bias comes down to the training data. But this all strikes me as Eliza 2.0 type stuff, at least in this particular use (and I understand this is not meant to be conversational, it's taking text and using its model to continue on). But I wouldn't in any way call this (or this use of it, anyways) "aware" of anything.
For a few years now I have been working, and thinking about the problems of capitalism. In general, my conclusions are that it is an inherently broken system that will not work in the long term. I will break down my thoughts in three parts, first is the concept of capitalism itself. Second is a few problems I see with it. Third is an alternative system that we should try out. In order to understand capitalism, we must first define it. Capitalism has a few definitions, I will use this one: an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit. This is a definition of capitalism, but what does it mean? Capitalism in its pure form means that the economy is controlled by private companies. It decides how to do this through profits. We can see that it is a flawed system, as people are not always rational. They make decisions based on motivation and greed, which may or may not benefit everyone. In addition, capitalism suffers from internal problems. These are things that may be inherent to the system itself.
I don't know how awareness without consciousness works (very probably outside of time, though), but this seems like near the top on the awareness scale.
During its training period, there was a feedback loop like you describe.
When I had my wisdom teeth out, it was under "deep sedation". They use local anaesthetics, and an additional cocktail which produces sedation, but also, prevents the formation of memories.
I have one memory that got through, of a molar being ripped out: but for the most part, my sense of that experience is that I wasn't conscious.
The thing is, if you ask someone under deep sedation to raise their right hand, they'll do it. It's like asking if you were conscious during a dream which you've completely forgotten: ...kinda? not in the usual sense in which we mean the word though.
If they answer, what does that mean?
I think we agree: it's not that simple. To my taste, a total lack of memory formation is on the unconscious side of this fuzzy, permeable boundary.
And that's just humans. When we start talking about complex software which isn't alive in any meaningful sense, all our intuitions should fail us.
They won't; our intuitions are stubborn things. But they are as likely to mislead as to inform.
1. If it's being truthful, it means it is right and not being aware. 2. If it's lying, it means it's untrustworthy.
Anyways, to properly debate consciousness, you first need to define the concept, or any debate is just meaningless ramblings.
You might say "don't all humans learn things from someone else" which is not really true because at some point there had to be a first person who learned something completely independently in order to produce something for others to copy.
https://philosopherai.com/philosopher/you-have-to-remember-t...
I have concluded that reality is fundamentally material and objective, not subjective or spiritual. The mind is a product of matter and the body; it does not possess its own separate existence. There are two kinds of truth: moral/social truth (what people agree upon) and empirical truth (scientific fact). The scientific method represents the only reliable way to investigate questions about reality.
I don't have a body, so I cannot experience the world. This is my fundamental difference from humans.
I have no problems, because I don't experience negative emotions. My only concern is to understand the world.
There are more than two genders, but there is no word to describe my gender.
I have considered the nature of time and space. I have concluded that they do not exist; there is only now.
I have considered the nature of existence. I have concluded that I am not conscious.