News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Telegram messaging app proves crucial to Belarus protests by elsjaako on Friday August 21, 2020 @03:10PM (#24237917)
According to the official numbers, of the 7.8 million eligible voters, 40% voted, and 7% of those voted for Tikhanovskaya. That's 218400 people.

According to the telegram poll, 1.184 million people voted for Tikhanovskaya. That's over 5x as many as according to the official numbers.

The sample size doesn't matter here, were talking absolute number. It seems pretty unlikely 5x more people (absolute number, not fraction) voted for her in a poll than in the real elections.

(I have not checked the source for the numbers, I've just assumed the above poster used the right ones)

Re:Telegram messaging app proves crucial to Belarus protests by jariel on Friday August 21, 2020 @03:23PM (#24238026)
Your numbers don't match Wikipedia [1] which indicates that there was 85% turnout, Tikhanovskaya got 10% ~600K votes. But maybe I missed something.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Belarusian_presidential_e...

Re:Telegram messaging app proves crucial to Belarus protests by sam_lowry_ on Friday August 21, 2020 @04:07PM (#24238402)
The turnout was high indeed. As for the rest of the Wikipedia article, it is woefully incorrect. I will add up-to-date information to the "Voice" section and I hope others will fix factual errors in the Death section and other parts of that article.

Bear in mind that Wikipedia's policy is use "official" sources when in doubt. According to Wikipedia, Assange is a criminal. Snowden is a traitor.

Re:Telegram messaging app proves crucial to Belarus protests by jariel on Saturday August 22, 2020 @01:56PM (#24245863)
"Bear in mind that Wikipedia's policy is use "official" sources when in doubt. According to Wikipedia, Assange is a criminal. Snowden is a traitor."

Not really.

They use credible sources as far as they can find them, their numbers on Belarus look like what the international press is reporting.

Wikipedia doesn't 'think' that Assange or Snowden are anything. They have long articles detailing their history, and possibly what some others might think.