And even if that weren't the case, you're ignoring all of my other points, particularly the one about the floppy system being proven in the field for years, and your failure to provide examples of accidents attributable to the use of floppies.
Come up with some sources specific to your concern about floppies if you can, or this conversation has run its course.
> Their mouth pieces repeated the refrain 'safest form of travel' over an over
Unless they're covering up thousands of fatalities (they aren't), the statistics are pretty clear.
I don't think the FAA could satisfactorily prove to me that corrupted data has never made it onto a plane and that plane wasn't thereafter flown with passengers. Software has been getting a free pass, I doubt they have ever competently audited any flight control software.
FAA has always been dysfunctional. It's just that nowadays with the internet, Boeing and the FAA can no longer control the narrative to the same degree. Just look how how they handled the crashes in the 90s [1]. The FAA and Boeing basically dismissed the crashes entirely with shoulder shrugs. Their mouth pieces repeated the refrain 'safest form of travel' over an over. They were asleep at the wheel then, just like now.
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_rudder_issues