Re:The software industry is going through the “disposable pl...
by the_why_of_y on Saturday August 22, 2020 @07:05AM
(#24243304)
Research from 1995 [1] indicates that robustness was not a strength of AT&T UNIX.
"The reliability of the basic utilities from GNU and Linux were noticeably better than those of the commercial systems."
[0] ftp://ftp.cs.wisc.edu/paradyn/technical_papers/fuzz.pdf
[1] ftp://ftp.cs.wisc.edu/paradyn/technical_papers/fuzz-revisited.pdf
Re:The software industry is going through the “disposable pl...
by kwhat4 on Friday August 21, 2020 @11:48AM
(#24235847)
May of the design philosophies laid by smart people like Eric Raymond are very well documented:
https://medium.com/programming-philosophy/eric-raymond-s-17-...
Re:The software industry is going through the “disposable pl...
by blablabla123 on Friday August 21, 2020 @04:14PM
(#24238460)
> Does this describe Unix, for example? In particular the old AT&T version, not GNU
At least to me. Having all these composable commands, unimaginable through how many iterations all that stuff went. I also think that Go was created in that spirit, with robustness/conciseness being more important than anything. Although it seems the language and its philosophy is adapting to more common ways of doing things.
I wonder if that's how the implementors of software that actually lasted for decades would describe their work or motivation.
Does this describe Unix, for example? In particular the old AT&T version, not GNU (or even modern BSD) code.