Re:Uber and Lyft shutdown in California averted as judge gra...
by InitialLastName on Thursday August 20, 2020 @05:48PM
(#24229420)
> Some people might be at no risk, some higher.
All rideshare drivers are (by definition) participating in the most dangerous activity (western) humans do on a daily basis. Every non-utilized minute they spend on the road adds risk to them as well as to other members of society.
Re:Uber and Lyft shutdown in California averted as judge gra...
by Daishiman on Thursday August 20, 2020 @06:55PM
(#24229973)
The fact that in most places in the world there's legislation that defines requirements and responsibilities for professional drivers, from qualifications, to insurance, alcohol intake, maximum working hours, minimum rest hours, etc., Implies that it totally does exist.
How do you know the personal situation of each of Uber's/Lyft's drivers? How do we measure risk for each person in an objective way? Some people might be at no risk, some higher. We can't know! What right is there in taking away options that benefit some people because it might possibly not work well for someone who voluntarily signed a contract? This is not liberal policy. This is paternalistic, state-controlled economic oppression.