Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by ls612 on Thursday August 20, 2020 @11:55AM
(#24224556)
It directly implies that if we prefer dying later to dying sooner (in almost all cases) that older peoples lives would have statistically less value. Which is anathema to many Americans. The only way around it is to say you are indifferent to when death is for people, which is also anathema to a lot of people. It’s a paradox of our ethical system.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by aflag on Thursday August 20, 2020 @06:05PM
(#24229571)
If you consider that shortening someone's life is not a continuum but discreetly bad, then there is no paradox. Moreover, I consider that to be the only ethical way to view it. If you take the life expectancy of the victim when judging the killer, you may find yourself giving lighter sentences for those who kill impoverished people, who have a shorter life expectancy, than those who kill rich people.