Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by jdminhbg on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @02:43PM
(#24214376)
> Why is "economic" harm so important?
The "economy" is just our way of measuring what people do for themselves and others all day. "Some artisan dog biscuit company" is someone else's lifelong work and dream, not just a number in a spreadsheet. Minimizing may make you feel better about selfishly demanding everyone turn their lives off, but it's not an accurate representation of the world.
Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by missedthecue on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @02:47PM
(#24214432)
That's fine. The problem people have is when the government bans the dog biscuit company from operating for arbitrary reasons and they go under
Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by mam2 on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @02:32PM
(#24214197)
people need money to eat. 60% of americans have 0 savings.
It's not just about you
Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by reaperducer on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @02:42PM
(#24214352)
You can't earn money to eat and go to the gym if the hospitals are overflowing with virus victims and society collapses.
Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by yryan on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @08:09PM
(#24218401)
Hospitals are not overflowing.
Re:Secret gyms and the economics of prohibition
by abduhl on Wednesday August 19, 2020 @02:34PM
(#24214213)
I'm really tired of people saying "But what about my health?" I really don't care. I care about my job and the businesses of my family members. If some work from home keyboard jockey gets sick because they left their house instead of locking themselves inside, so be it.
Who cares? Why is "economic" harm so important?
I'm really tired of people saying "But what about the economy?" I really don't care. I care about my health and the health of my family members. If some artisan dog biscuit company goes out of business, so be it.