Re:Computing belongs within the social sciences
by acituan on Monday August 17, 2020 @09:39PM
(#24194440)
> The whole point of TFA is that pure intelligence (particularly "computational thinking" type of intelligence) is no substitute for the knowledge and methodology already explored by various humanities and social science fields.
This is such a false dichotomy. There exists many, many technical programs that go to field and do that type of "social" research, using the precisely the same methodologies, knowledge of which end up with UX designers, product designers, product managers etc. This TFA readily admits. In other words, anything that social sciences can offer is already being incorporated into those programs. (I am talking about likes of human computer interaction, user experience, information processing science, network science, and tons of other hybrid programs)
Re:Computing belongs within the social sciences
by noslenwerdna on Monday August 17, 2020 @08:56PM
(#24194161)
However, can a social science framework actually predict what would happen, rather than postdict (after it happened).
If so, why didn't they make such predictions in 2012 during Facebook's IPO?
The whole point of TFA is that pure intelligence (particularly "computational thinking" type of intelligence) is no substitute for the knowledge and methodology already explored by various humanities and social science fields.