Re:Arm co-founder: Sale to Nvidia would be a disaster
by shaklee3 on Sunday August 16, 2020 @12:30AM
(#24175131)
This is increasingly becoming not true. See cutlass and the new release of cufftdx.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Arm co-founder: Sale to Nvidia would be a disaster
by ris on Sunday August 16, 2020 @10:19AM
(#24178027)
These are both things that are unlikely to ever be able to run on anything other than nvidia hardware. It's hardly a mark in their favour over abusive lock-in practices.
Re:Arm co-founder: Sale to Nvidia would be a disaster
by shaklee3 on Sunday August 16, 2020 @10:24AM
(#24178075)
Well, of course. They're written in cuda. Why would Nvidia try to write it in a language like opencl that even AMD is moving away from, and instead making fft/blas library calls? At least the source code is there if you wanted to port it.
Re:Arm co-founder: Sale to Nvidia would be a disaster
by ris on Sunday August 16, 2020 @07:27PM
(#24182286)
I think it's very clear that I wasn't commenting on what framework they choose to write their projects in, and you're rather deliberately missing my point.
Re:Arm co-founder: Sale to Nvidia would be a disaster
by shaklee3 on Sunday August 16, 2020 @08:26PM
(#24182596)
> These are both things that are unlikely to ever be able to run on anything other than nvidia hardware.
I think it's very clear that the framework was important here. Because you were pointing out that they don't open source much, I pointed out that they do, then you nitpicked by saying it's cuda.