But that's not at all what OP answered.
Rather that it could be gainful for the owners of the factory to give out part of its produce to provide stability and hence protect the factory.
Rather that it could be gainful for the owners of the factory to give out part of its produce to provide stability and hence protect the factory.
I asked, "If it costs someone literally nothing to save lives, but they can't profit from it either, how can I CONVINCE them to do it?"
And your answer is, "They shouldn't have to. We should militarize the police to protect their rights to be heartless."
I don't even know how to respond.
No, that's not the right answer.