News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by capableweb on Saturday August 15, 2020 @05:35AM (#24167473)
> I think the thing in the middle is taking to Twitter to complain immediately

What I meant is that flow of the events seem to have been something like:

- User received notification about impeding upgrade

- User replies to Ghost and tweets about the event

- CEO replies on Twitter

- ??? (Here it feels like some information is missing)

- Ghost terminates the users service

I cannot fathom that a user complains once via Twitter, and Ghost terminates their account. Has to be something else that have happened, otherwise this is way beyond crazy to do (from Ghosts side)

> I run multiple services, and I expect people to give me a chance to resolve problems before taking to Twitter. If they don't then I contact them to express my disappointment that they haven't done so, and then I have, on occasion, refunded people, returned their data, and terminated their service.

Same here, with lots of people complaining about bunch of different things and I have never, paying user or not, terminated their service unless I've asked before if I can terminate it or not.

Interesting to see that there are others who simply terminate users service when the user complains (gives feedback), wonder how that impacts the bottom line?

Re:Ghost.org deleted my website by ColinWright on Saturday August 15, 2020 @06:12AM (#24167673)
I've said elsewhere that I've never terminated services purely because the customer complains, and I've never done it without notice. I think the CEO gets that wrong. As I said, neither party comes out of this looking good.

But I have certainly terminated services from one side, without asking permission, after trying multiple times to resolve the issues.