News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Has anyone migrated off containerized infrastruct... by AkshatM on Thursday August 13, 2020 @08:52PM (#24151905)
I interpret it as a suggestion that you allow developers access to the running container in production to debug the issue

There are more sane ways to do this than through raw kubectl access, of course: see e.g. telepresence (https://www.telepresence.io/)

Re:Ask HN: Has anyone migrated off containerized infrastruct... by funcDropShadow on Friday August 14, 2020 @05:50AM (#24155856)
By sane, you mean yet another piece of infrastructure that has to be installed, documented, packaged into containers, deployed and updated for a problem that did not exist without containers. For a very large organization (e.g. hundreds of devs) this make sense, but for a medium sized company (> billion EUR turnover per year outside of software business) this soon becomes just another piece of overhead.
Re:Ask HN: Has anyone migrated off containerized infrastruct... by wwright on Friday August 14, 2020 @07:22AM (#24156500)
This problem certainly exists without containers.

- How do you provide easy visibility into running applications?

- How do you prevent inspecting an application from affecting the behavior of an application?

Re:Ask HN: Has anyone migrated off containerized infrastruct... by sseagull on Friday August 14, 2020 @07:52AM (#24156681)
You put this fairly succinctly. And I agree wholeheartedly.

I think of the phrase “adding epicycles” when this kind of stuff starts happening.