I'm not anti-vax, but anti-vaxers use this same tactic; they use ambiguity to breed fear against vaccines.
I get that some unknowns are dangerous, but there has to be a limit, right? We can't be afraid of everything we don't know.
https://news.berkeley.edu/2020/07/08/from-lung-scarring-to-h...
I hope I’m wrong. In six months or a year maybe I’ll feel more comfortable with the risk to my kids (and myself with a damaged spinal cord), but right now I don’t and to equate it to anti-vaxxers is fairly insulting.
This is contrasted to the long term health consequences of COVID-19, which appears could be significant, but we just aren't certain yet only because there just aren't any long term survivors yet and thus studies [0] related to it haven't been completed. I don't think this is past the limit.
0 - https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/news/2020/looking-forward-understa...
EDIT: And, in fact, the CDC says that the Flu is more dangerous to healthy children than COVID-19: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/symptoms/flu-vs-covid19.htm and search for 'children'. Though the CDC may not be a trusted source for many...