Bertrand Russell's argument for idleness is more relevant than ever

Re:Bertrand Russell's argument for idleness is more relevant... by josho on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:12PM (#24137645)

The core of it stands that 'urban populations have become mainly passive'. Perhaps I'd consider revising to replace passive with consumers. So, we've been taught and continually urged to spend our idle hours consuming. So, it isn't a surprise to me that most folks don't know any other way to spend their time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bertrand Russell's argument for idleness is more relevant... by goldenkey on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:50PM (#24138004)

Consumption usually costs money and increases money velocity, which leads to a better economy. So it's a bit different than "idleness."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bertrand Russell's argument for idleness is more relevant... by brokenmachine on Thursday August 13, 2020 @01:23AM (#24140181)

A better economy... Please define "better".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bertrand Russell's argument for idleness is more relevant... by goldenkey on Thursday August 13, 2020 @03:01PM (#24146951)

Money is worse when its velocity is low. This is associated with hoarding of cash.

The world could have 10000T in cash but if no exchange happens, everyone is poor.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bertrand Russell's argument for idleness is more relevant... by brokenmachine on Friday August 14, 2020 @02:31AM (#24154435)

Endless consumption is a delusion, regardless of how much "better" the economy appears.

Idleness doesn't necessitate consumption, and it's interesting that that conclusion was jumped to.

[ Parent | on HN ]