The evidence is that he was pushed out of the CEO position, and received a monetary settlement lol.
A person would have to be extremely stupid to think that if someone got pushed out of a CEO position, that it is somehow impossible that the company/ceo would be incentivized to not talk about.
There is quite obviously a financial incentive here. I am not sure how someone could deny the existence of this financial incentive.
This is standard stuff. It is completely reasonable that either of them would not want the bad publicity from that, and that there are financial incentives to not admit that he was pushed out of the CEO position.
Executives get pushed out of positions, without companies or the executives admitting to it, or lying and saying that they left voluntarily.
I specifically asked you for evidence, which you failed to provide. "Laughing out loud" is not proof, it just highlights that you don't have any.
So I'll ask you again for proof: provide a link to a reputable source that proves that he was pushed out, that he received a monetary settlement, and that Eich and the FAQ are lying.
Otherwise the only thing you've proven is that homophobes will bend over backwards, twist facts, and lie to rationalize and cover up for each other's bigotry. If you can't prove it, then apologize for spreading misinformation.
You're accusing Eich and the board of lying, but now I've asked you to prove that YOU are not lying, and you've failed.
Someone would have to be completely and entirely lost, to not be able to see the clear and obvious motivations for a large corporation to lie about the idea that it pushed their freaking CEO out of the position.
It is not misinformation to point out the completely apparent financial motivation for them doing this.
That is the evidence that I am referencing.
I absolutely consider it to be evidence if there is a huge and obvious financial motivation.
How did he benefit from going scorched earth by trying to destroy other people's marriages?