News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by realusername on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:13AM (#24129950)
> Dutch outlet NU.nl reported that a Facebook spokesperson clarified to them that the ban extends to Zwarte Piet, also known as Black Peter, a folk character that accompanies St. Nicholas on Christmas.

And here is exactly why it's a stupid idea, different countries have different culture and history.

We also celebrate the exact same event in my place and it's just a part of kindergarten, nothing related about US culture. People needs to be less stubborn and understand that not everywhere is the same as the place they grew up.

Edit: Although I've just learned that the Dutch & German versions look indeed different compared to my place. The massive black-beard ones we have in my place would still be okay for Facebook I believe, but it's the same concept really.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by bkor on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:22AM (#24129995)
> And here is exactly why it's a stupid idea, different countries have different culture and history.

Even culture can negatively affect certain groups. Apparently the Zwarte Piet thing is negatively affecting and causing some racism.

There's the entirely ridiculous "Kick Out Zwarte Piet" group, whose behaviour initially made me against whatever they wanted to happen. There's also some practicalities. Normally kids wouldn't recognize the people playing "Sinterklaas" or "Zwarte Piet". The initial proposed alternatives were bad.

Still, saying "culture" as the only reason for being against something? It's not good enough!

I'm Dutch btw.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by sebazzz on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @11:26AM (#24132988)
The entire core of the question is whether when something is not intended to be racist is racist.

For instance: in Iran there is a festivity in which a person with a black face plays a huge role, and it has been declared world cultural heritage. I wonder why there is no discussion about that.

Is that because the Dutch are white and the past is the VOC and slavery? Or because the Dutch are white?

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by ralfn on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @12:58PM (#24134057)
> Is that because the Dutch are white and the past is the VOC and slavery? Or because the Dutch are white?

As a Dutch person I will answer: the first.

The great grandfather's of the black kids getting name called 'Zwarte Piet' because of this tradition were literally slaves. Their grandparents were free but did not have remotely the same chances in life. Often couldn't read/write. Any original culture or family ties they had were completely erased. It wasn't like we allowed them to 'raise their kids' when they were slaves. Their parents had it much better. Went to the same schools, etc. Still had to deal with racism when going out or trying to get a nice job, but not at all with persecution. They still did not having a lot of good role models within their own community yet. And don't think about trying to go to a club or join a fraternity.

The current generation is the first one performing on par with native people within society. With more good role models and succesfull entrepeneurs.

Honestly. Decent folks in the Netherlands already changed the tradition to the chimney style. Small subtle change. Doesn't harm anyone.

The people at this moment who still strongly hold on to Zwarte Piet .. are racist. But the tradition wasn't intended to be. And before the discussions started it wasn't. It is now. Because it's impossible to claim that minor changes to traditions are this important to someone unless the intend is racist. Traditions that were always changing. That have changed over and over again. And the only change that is a discussion is this one.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by rich_sasha on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:59AM (#24130221)
Came here to say _exactly_ this.

Racism is awful, but going around with US-shaped visors and using that as the sole/primary criterion of it is not good.

For another example: there is no association between Blackface and racism in Poland. Sure, there is plenty of racism on other grounds, but e.g. a white person putting on black make-up isn't part of it.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by dcow on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:15AM (#24130310)
It's also not as black and white in the US despite the popular narrative. Blackface was an avenue of opportunity for freed black slaves to gain social visibility while at the same time a way for white people to slowly introduce black culture into the narrative. The practice of comedy at the expense of black slave stereotypes has fallen out of practice because it's no longer culturally relevant, for sure, but "coon" culture had an important role to play in US history. A modern analog might be hip hop. Eminem and other white rappers arguably don black-speak to participate in a scene that idolizes, or celebrates, the struggles of low income, predominately black, communities. But the art tells an important story. And it's great music!
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by kome on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:30AM (#24130420)
same with nudity, and this puritan obsession pushed by US megacorps...
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by asutekku on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:18AM (#24129980)
Svarte Piet is arguably a racist caricature, so I can see why it was banned. And no, it’s not just soot on his face, as some people like to claim.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by realusername on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:21AM (#24129990)
Where would you draw the line? In my place it's more common for him to have a very massive black beard covering 3/4 of his face instead so you can almost only see the eyes, is that more acceptable?

Its root is in mythology rather than anything else.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by asutekku on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:26AM (#24130008)
I’d say the line should drawn on the presentation. If we have hundreds of people on the streets wearing blackface and and red lipstick, that’s not okay. However if he’s presented as this bearded fellow, i see no problem.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by realusername on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:31AM (#24130038)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/33/Fo...

This is the kind of representation of this man you have in my place. So yeah while this one is probably okay for Facebook, I understand the point of view of the Dutch and the German ones which are basically the exact same concept but with different visual choices.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by the-dude on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:28AM (#24130021)
And what about the black women from Suriname who for years enjoyed volunteering for the role?

They are turned away by the organizing committee ... tada, because they are black.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by boomboomsubban on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:46AM (#24130135)
Or she could play any other role in the play.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by the-dude on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:59AM (#24130220)
Name one.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by boomboomsubban on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @07:20AM (#24130835)
I don't have familiarity with the story, but I highly doubt skin color is an important detail for any other character. St. Nick is Turkish after all.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by tibbydudeza on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:27AM (#24130010)
Holland was a colonial power - are you actually claiming Black Peter is all Dutch culture and has absolutely nothing to do with black servitude ???.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by enriquto on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:29AM (#24130028)
I guess they are claiming that Black Peter has nothing to do with minstrel shows, that are the reason why blackface is problematic in the USA (and it shouldn't really be anywhere else, in my opinion).
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by realusername on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:36AM (#24130063)
You have the same character in Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland and eastern France, it's just part of a cross-european culture.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by tobyhinloopen on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:21AM (#24129992)
Black Pete is a controversial subject for years by now. Given that “some” people might consider it racist, I’m not surprised that it’s no longer allowed on Facebook.

Also note the BLM movement that spread through our country as well, which I think will definitely impact the public opinion for about black pete.

Not saying I agree or disagree; not going to touch that dumpster fire with my opinions.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by wwwwwwwww on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:22AM (#24129996)
It's especially dumb because the character is a positive reference to blacks. How will it help anybody if we remove all black people from our traditions and history?
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by bkor on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:30AM (#24130032)
How's showing a certain group of people in a ridiculous way helping blacks and showing positivity?

I agree that Zwarte Piet is portrayed as a great person/character. Despite that, the way it's shown is nowadays outdated and is actually harmful. So despite everything being done in a way that is NOT racist at all, in practice it does cause some harm.

IMO the easy way out would still be to paint people, but to paint them in some weird colour.

Note: it took me a long time to get to this, this as "Kick Out Zwarte Piet" is one of the most stupid advocacy groups that I've seen. It almost seems like a hidden advocacy group IMO.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by DanBC on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:49AM (#24130153)
> IMO the easy way out would still be to paint people, but to paint them in some weird colour.

This is what some English / Welsh "Border Morris" dancers do. This page shows a wide mix. There's full black, half black or black shapes, soot-like smudges[1], mixed black and colour, or full non-black colour.

http://projectbritain.com/mayday/morrisdancing.html

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by tibbydudeza on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:28AM (#24130020)
You being serious ???. Big lips ... gold earings ... it the offensive "coon" caricature.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by wwwwwwwww on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:35AM (#24130057)
How do the other characters look like? Do they wear modern clothing and carry books?

Or are they portrayed as well as they where when the tradition started?

Also, what's is bad about big lips? Or earrings?

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by bkor on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:38AM (#24130086)
Zwarte Piet / Black Pete is considered a great person (admirable). This despite the way that the person is shown. IMO it's always funny/humourus that people assume something else, especially it it's followed by various wild accusations. Suggest to read up on what's being celebrated.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by DanBC on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:57AM (#24130199)
Is he? https://www.humanityinaction.org/knowledge_detail/black-pete...

> Enter the modern day Sinterklaas and Zwarte Piet. Leading up to W.W.II, Black Pete’s job was to investigate which children had been “bad,” and to take them away in his sack and/or whip them for discipline. Today, the dominating image of Black Pete is more one of entertainment for others’ enjoyment: He helps Sinterklaas deliver the presents and no longer acts as the one who brings punishment to the bad children. But the old task of Black Pete is still referred to in a funny matter. Many parents joke and say “I will tell Black Pete to take you with him to Spain!”. Sinterklaas will ask Black Pete to see ‘The Book’, which lists all the right and wrong things a child did. Over time, Zwarte Piet’s character morphed into a group of Black Petes; all considered a Zwarte Piet, but each with different characteristics.

> In the celebrations, Sinterklaas, who is white, is played by a white person. Black Pete is played in full blackface, usually by a white person as well, or by a black person also in blackface. The actors paint their faces black with huge red lips, wear a curly wig and Moorish dress. “They are portrayed as young, and agile, and do much running and jumping around and acting like acrobats,” says Leyla Hamidi of the National Bureau Against Racial Discrimination. Sinterklaas is portrayed as old, wise, mature, calm, and in control. In celebrations and the media, Black Pete is overwhelmingly viewed by children and adults as unintelligent and clownish. These and other characteristics were found to be typical characteristics of Black Pete as well as black characters in general in Dutch children’s books. Berend’s research found them portrayed as dumb, childish, idle, foolish, and strict (for the old version of Black Pete). Berends further showed similar results for the main physical depictions of black people in children’s books and Black Pete imagery – including enlarged red lips, enlarged white teeth, and enlarged and bulging eyes.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by enriquto on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:32AM (#24130041)
Pretending that people in the nederlands are familiar with a cultural thing from the american continent (in that case, the "coon" caricatures, that have 0 history in northern europe), is an offensive form of cultural imposition.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by raxxorrax on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @06:34AM (#24130459)
Wouldn't go as far as saying it is cultural imposition, it is just ignorance.
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by the-dude on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:16AM (#24129971)
I have talked about the word neger ( Dutch variant of negro ) with all my known black acquaintances and also with some whom I didn't know before.

Nobody had any problems with the word neger. "Of course I am a neger they said, and you are a white guy. So what, just don't call me zwarte ( black ).".

This is in NL.

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by sebazzz on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @11:22AM (#24132952)
That is interesting, because one of the black (should I call him that, I find "black" polarising) comedians here, Steven Brunswijk, used to call himself Braboneger which is a combination of his province and the mentioned word. However he stopped calling himself that because it wouldn't help his career (which I suppose means: others find it offensive). [0]

[0]: https://www.ad.nl/tilburg/braboneger-laat-bijnaam-vallen-en-...

Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by the-dude on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @12:56PM (#24134027)
Don't you think there is a fundamental difference between the casual use of the word and including it in your brand name?
Re:Facebook's new policy bans blackface and some Jewish ster... by luckylion on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:31AM (#24130039)
That's interesting, the word is very taboo in Germany, essentially only used by very old people, relatively far right-wing folks and some Africans (though much, much less so than in the US).