Re:Predictions as a Substitute for Reviews
by k_sze on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @05:28AM
(#24130018)
I didn't close the tab outright, but I agree that the author should be more forthcoming about what exactly they are talking about.
The whole "weekly review" thing just absolutely lacks context. Like, are they talking about the "weekly review" in the GTD methodology? Or in something like Scrum? Or something else entirely?
Re:Predictions as a Substitute for Reviews
by k_sze on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @09:34PM
(#24139119)
So I left a comment on that blog and the author replied that the "weekly review" is the one in GTD.
Re:Predictions as a Substitute for Reviews
by clairity on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @10:33AM
(#24132395)
you may then also like “Get Rid of the Performance Review!” by samuel culbert[0] which advocates performance previews (predictions) rather than backward-looking reviews.
[0] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7348406-get-rid-of-the-p...
(edited author name)
Re:Predictions as a Substitute for Reviews
by waterhouse on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @10:42AM
(#24132485)
Correction: Samuel Culbert, not Stephen Colbert.
> There is a lot of praise for weekly reviews. [...]
What are you talking about? Reviews of what? Predictions for what?
I finished reading the "Introduction" completely clueless what this article is about. I continued "Benefits", still not having a clue what the article is about. After another paragraph I closed the tab.
Sorry, this article seems to be targeted at some niche audience, and I'm not in it. It would be great to have some actual introduction to indicate what you are talking about.