Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by maxk42 on Monday August 10, 2020 @08:59PM
(#24116133)
To answer your first "Why?" it's because employees have to be paid much more when working over 40 hours / week. Drivers will no longer be able to work an extra 5 hours when they need extra money: They'll have to have a second job. Similarly, there are certain minimum costs associated with each employee above and beyond the costs of a contractor. This may mean Uber is forced to favor drivers who commit to a certain minimum of hours per week, ridding themselves of the "before and after work" driver crowd. The net effect of these two forces means Uber will just be another part-to-full-time job.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by jojobas on Monday August 10, 2020 @09:08PM
(#24116179)
Basically you're arguing that the race to the bottoms is good for everyone involved.
From a country that has hard fought-for USD16/hour minimum wage, paid 10 sick leave and 20 annual leave days per year, this doesn't appear true at all.
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by LudwigNagasena on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @12:44AM
(#24117234)
How does allowing flexible work arrangement imply “race to the bottom”?
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by jojobas on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @01:02AM
(#24117322)
Nothing precludes proper employees with flexible arrangements. Forfeiting overtime pay and other labor protections afforded by law are definitely race-to-the-bottomy.
Re:Uber and Lyft ordered by California judge to classify dri...
by LudwigNagasena on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @01:33AM
(#24117445)
Nothing precludes contractors having labor protections either.