It’s the same mechanism over and over. If I say something on a blog or newspaper like : “user Creato makes apps that make people dumber”

It is you who have to go on the defensive, especially if it gets spread far and wide, regardless if it is true or not. But the lie is out there and your truth has to catch up.

I think if someone was gay and or dealt with HIV in some form, they likely heard of Dr Fauci. Researchers definitely know who is. From his CDC bio: “In a 2020 analysis of Google Scholar citations, Dr. Fauci ranked as the 41st most highly cited researcher of all time. According to the Web of Science, Dr. Fauci ranked 7th out of more than 1.8 million authors in the field of immunology by total citation count between 1980 and January 2020.”

Right, that's no one, statistically speaking. In particular, the people calling for Fauci's family to be harmed are not in the group you mentioned.

Effectively 0% of people knew Anthony Fauci?

Maybe zero young people but I’d say well informed middle age and up would know who Facui is. It’s hard to debate this with a source but these people have even in the news for decades when things go wrong. I disagree with the “effective 0%”

Here is the google trends data from Fauci.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&ge...

Gosh down votes for this

Okay let me try to show my side of “0%“ is wrong”

“author, coauthor, or editor of more than 1,300 scientific publications, including several textbooks.“

“Dr. Fauci ranked 7th out of more than 1.8 million authors in the field of immunology by total citation count between 1980 and January 2020.”

Note this isn’t just 2020. It’s a long history.

“Dr. Fauci was appointed director of NIAID in 1984.” And has served under 6 presidents. Most of which had more than 1 term.

If you are looking for a long list of awards and honorary doctorates head over to his Wikipedia page.

To the replies I got - I don’t consider 30’s middle aged. I guess I was thinking if you were around with AIDS news in the 80’s you might remember him. Oxford dictionary considers middled aged 45-65 - google trending searches isn’t how I would evaluate the history of someone over decades of time.

For fun I did fin a bunch of videos of times he was on TV via YouTube. So again my point is that 0% is far from right.

I’m a allegedly well-educated well-over-30s person, didn’t know who either of them were.