As for 2, if it's such a problem, just don't make the argument. It genuinely comes off as wanting people to agree with you rather than any real interest towards engaging in actual discussion.
Then just disagree with me.
I didn't say it was fast OR slow. I just said it's not slow enough to be the problem that you're claiming it is.
If you disagree with this, could you provide evidence of a situation where accessing elements with strings is a bottleneck? As I said, I've never seen this in practice and if it can be the case I would like to know more.
> Compare that to a similar approach that makes use of the standard DOM methods
querySelector is a standard DOM method.
> and no selectors
I don't know what you're referring to here. Could you provide an example?
The reason I refuse to post numbers myself is because:
1. I provided a tool where people can run any manner of discovery for their own numbers and see performance differences in various approaches.
2. People, when presented with a valid comparison will irrationally ignore results that challenge their opinion.
EDIT:
I looked closer at the measureit experiments and it seems there is some sort of bias. If you run the same experiment using an element already present in the page the results are the same for querySelector but 50% greater for the getElementById approach. Other perf tools I have tried did not display this kind of bias and they also reported substantially higher numbers for all user agents, most especially for desktop Firefox.