All of which I can live without.
Still the best way of sharing content on the web is via a url, which is handily provided, so most of these aren't even needed. As for recommended and view counts, these don't inherently add a lot of value to users. If anything, it's a nice change to have a page that doesn't try and infer my desires for once.
A simple "last 5 articles" in the corner do add value. Users frequently read more than one article.
(As an aside - nobody nobody has ever derived value out of a page counter except the owner of the site - who could just look it up in the logs. This isn't really an argument against anything you mentioned but I found it amusing it was one of the things you brought up)
1. Mostly nobody - sure there were some folks, but then again I'd wager a significant portion of those folks were just loud voices echoing from the marketing department.
Myspace era wants their featureset back.
More seriously I think for personal sites a JAMstack site is perfectly sufficient
The other things you name are present on my other website (which I linked above). The site is still blazing fast.
https://anonyfox.com/spells/frontend-social-buttons-without-...
Very basic but does the job I'd say. :)
Also, no share button. No top/recommended articles. No view counter.
Once you start adding medias it will be quite a bit slower. Once you start implementing basic features expected by users (comments and related articles for a blog) it's gonna be yet again slower.
I remember when my first article went viral out of the blue, I think have to thank the (useless) share buttons for that. Then it did 1TB of network traffic over the next days, largely due to a pair of GIF. That's how bad pictures can be.