News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:United Airlines plans to resume service on more than 25 i... by detritus on Tuesday August 04, 2020 @07:43AM (#24048936)
I consider myself fairly hygenic and don't think I have any diseases, and don't really think we should be concerned about clouds of particulate spittle - so what difference is a little quantity?

If I want to spit on the restaurant or train floor, I darn well will! What difference does it make?

Re:United Airlines plans to resume service on more than 25 i... by k33n on Tuesday August 04, 2020 @09:08AM (#24049554)
I'm walking around minding my own business, not spitting on people. People who wear their masks while riding a bicycle or walking down the street are making decisions based on what a biased media has told them, not science or data.
Re:United Airlines plans to resume service on more than 25 i... by detritus on Tuesday August 04, 2020 @09:14AM (#24049600)
Which is why I chose two private domains in my examples - a consumer retail environment and public transport, both of which were subject to a change in culture 100-odd years ago, wherein prior boors wouldn't have even questioned spitting on the floor.

'Clearly that is rude' to a modern audience.

I don't disagree with your views on people wearing masks when there's no one about, or they're in a car or on a bike, etc, but you didn't make a distinction initially between that and places where it's reasonable to expect people should 'just shut up and put a mask on'.

Re:United Airlines plans to resume service on more than 25 i... by k33n on Tuesday August 04, 2020 @10:00AM (#24050009)
It's never a reasonable position that someone should "shut up and do what I say". So many pro-science and rational thinkers have let fear totally consume them. I'm not sure why. The death rate for COVID-19 is less than 1% of infected.
Re:United Airlines plans to resume service on more than 25 i... by detritus on Tuesday August 04, 2020 @10:09AM (#24050118)
It's more 'stop being a prick and be polite'. Society is a series of rules, stated or otherwise, that the generality gravitate around. It's not rocket science, it's just manners.

One has every right not to wear a mask, just as a business owner has every right to deny someone access to their facilities.

Masks are irritating, but the sheer histrionics that they are causing in some quarters is ludicrous and is clearly more 'anti-science' (if that's really your criticism here) than the masked contingent is.