Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo...
by lopis on Monday August 03, 2020 @07:50AM
(#24036522)
One could also say that Google has proportionally more to loose from the advent of privacy consciousness in people and companies - namely the latest moves by Apple.
But at the end of the day, with most people still using Chrome and giving away their browsing history to Google without a second thought, I don't think Google is too worried at this point.
Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo...
by switch11 on Wednesday August 05, 2020 @06:47AM
(#24059269)
Everyone other than Google - no data
Google - all the data
That's what this is
Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo...
by mda on Monday August 03, 2020 @07:13AM
(#24036305)
Do you have any actual technical counterpoints?
Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo...
by imglorp on Monday August 03, 2020 @07:55AM
(#24036552)
I think the problem is the hens are watching the fox design the coop. They've been invited to participate, but the fox has unlimited resources at its disposal for research and planning while the hens are of meager means.
So yes, it may be unkind to prejudge the fox, but based on years of prior malice towards all poultry in the yard, and without fully understanding its plans, we have to assume it won't turn out well for us chickens.
Cluck.
Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo...
by Havoc on Monday August 03, 2020 @07:56AM
(#24036558)
No because I wasn't commenting on the technical aspect. A proposal can be both technically sound and wildly monopolistic at the same time.
Not everything is a pure engineering problem.
Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo...
by dumbneurologist on Monday August 03, 2020 @08:32PM
(#24045194)
Why are social and economic arguments against it invalid?
Re:Google starts testing its replacement for third-party coo...
by speedgoose on Monday August 03, 2020 @09:11AM
(#24037295)
Personally I didn't even bothered to read the proposal. No need for technical counterpoints, it's made by Google.
Whatever comes out of it is bound to either not be great for privacy or it will be an improvement but hit the smaller players. ie everyone not google. eg take away Cookies to prevent tracking. Leaving them the only one company with sight of near everything (google analytics & Adsense & Chrome). And we already know from recent revelations that google isn’t above peeking under the hood of data sources they shouldn’t.
Whole thing seems insanely monopolistic to me.