Re:US travel firm $4.5M ransom negotiation open chat
by bananamerica on Sunday August 02, 2020 @09:29PM
(#24033294)
The main idea here is that prohibiting payouts might make the crime less frequent. That’s somehow reasonable given the relative low stakes involved—from a moral perspective, data is usually of a lesser value than human lives. Therefore, yes, those cases are very different indeed. For once, kidnapping a human being is already punishable enough by itself so it makes no sense to punish a payout that could actually save a live.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US travel firm $4.5M ransom negotiation open chat
by mlyle on Sunday August 02, 2020 @09:42PM
(#24033387)
The only reason the kidnappings happen is because the payouts happen. If effective measures stopped any real possibility of payouts, the kidnappings would stop, too, saving a lot more lives.
Re:US travel firm $4.5M ransom negotiation open chat
by bananamerica on Sunday August 02, 2020 @09:54PM
(#24033456)
Possibly. The previous argument stand either way.