News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft and Bytedance Put TikTok Talks on Hold After Tr... by em500 on Saturday August 01, 2020 @07:38PM (#24024896)
"Security" also happens to be the favorite purported justification of most authoritarian measures in evil regimes. Just look at China: ubiquitous surveillance, censorship, concentration camps, suppression of dissent are all justified internally as "security measures".
Re:Microsoft and Bytedance Put TikTok Talks on Hold After Tr... by faned on Saturday August 01, 2020 @08:15PM (#24025137)
Should white nationalists be allowed to march and exist in the public space?
Re:Microsoft and Bytedance Put TikTok Talks on Hold After Tr... by saagarjha on Saturday August 01, 2020 @08:33PM (#24025241)
Yes, that's quite literally a textbook case of First Amendment rights.
Re:Microsoft and Bytedance Put TikTok Talks on Hold After Tr... by mhh__ on Sunday August 02, 2020 @12:08AM (#24026250)
Why not? They look like idiots doing it, people nearly always counter protest. It's always nice to see proof that the master race they ain't.
Re:Microsoft and Bytedance Put TikTok Talks on Hold After Tr... by innagadadavida on Sunday August 02, 2020 @02:53AM (#24026861)
There is an important difference in this instance - the US is applying these to a foreign company, not on its own citizens like China.
Re:Microsoft and Bytedance Put TikTok Talks on Hold After Tr... by rfoo on Sunday August 02, 2020 @03:14AM (#24026968)
I'm pretty sure when China banned Google & Facebook, it cited the reason as "not obeying local law" and "posing a national security threat".
Re:Microsoft and Bytedance Put TikTok Talks on Hold After Tr... by Slartie on Sunday August 02, 2020 @05:34AM (#24027529)
It was less national security and more not obeying local law, particularly the law mandating censorship of certain stuff.

I don't like the Chinese approach to managing the public opinion by censoring valid information and opinions at all. But the opaque and uncontrollable pockets of power created by the US approach of misusing "national security" as an excuse for practically any action, most of them being more politically motivated than anything else, is equally disturbing and problematic. Both of these ways of governing lend themselves equally well to dictatorships, which I consider problematic, especially in modern democracies, which the US certainly claims to be (the Chinese government at least doesn't claim to be a democracy in the first place).