News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by toomuchtodo on Saturday August 01, 2020 @04:42PM (#24023736)
How else would you negotiate with a bully like China? America is a bully too, but without Uighur concentration camps, fleets of fishing vessels farming the sea to extinction, outrageous claims over the South China Sea, etc.

You can only turn a blind eye so long to a competitor’s unreasonable actions (in this scope, IP/trade secrets and the like). As a US citizen, I endorse any actions intended to remove or subdue CCP influence, power, and control (domestically or internationally). None of this comment should be construed as a sleight against the Chinese people in aggregate.

Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by mcji on Sunday August 02, 2020 @03:07AM (#24026940)
> America is a bully too, but without Uighur concentration camps, fleets of fishing vessels farming the sea to extinction, outrageous claims over the South China Sea, etc.

but with Guantanamo Bay detention camp, bombming Iraq with fabricated evidence and killing hundreds of thousands innocent Iraqi people. Oh, let's not forget how Uncle Sam extended their territory by slaughtering Native Americans since 15th century. You even have a festival to celeberate the genocide and conquest of Native Americans by colonists.

Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by toxik on Sunday August 02, 2020 @05:21AM (#24027478)
Better not look into Chinese history then
Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by toomuchtodo on Sunday August 02, 2020 @11:16AM (#24029221)
dang, apologies this was flagged for your attention, I don’t understand why it was flagged but I’m actively seeking alternative forums [1] where this sort of discussion is welcome.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24028512

[dead]
Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by Grimm1 on Saturday August 01, 2020 @05:02PM (#24023883)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/07/14/china-us-cou...

Easily fact checked. China doubles the US on both Co2 and Methane emissions.

Edit: Got downvoted, but it's still true the above post is outright incorrect information.

Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by ClumsyPilot on Saturday August 01, 2020 @11:55PM (#24026207)
Which means that they emit much less per person. Or should countries be compared with no refrerence to their population, in which case Saudi Arabia is doing great?

Additionally, USA has had decades of relative prosperity to clean up its emissions, but did nothing.

Meanwhile China has more electric busses than the rest of the world combined, more hifgh-speed raio than the rest of the world combined, lead the world in investment in renewables and nuclear and are on track to meet their Paris accord commitment, unlike US.

Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by Grimm1 on Sunday August 02, 2020 @09:48AM (#24028672)
Looking at it per population is kind of ridiculous when it's very obviously corporations and manufacturing responsible for most green house gasses. The average person barely makes a difference both in regards to pollution, resource consumption and plastics.
Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by ClumsyPilot on Sunday August 02, 2020 @04:58PM (#24031689)
You have a point, but population is still the key metric. Corporatuons are, after all, made up of people. Whether those people produce emissions in their private life, or in their jobs.

Furthermore this is a production based accounting of CO2, if you instead do consumption-based accounting of CO2 then you will see a dramativally more savage picture.

Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by whoevercares on Saturday August 01, 2020 @05:31PM (#24024063)
Does comparing the total always make sense? How about we take the average? Twice the amount means each Chinese person emit about 1/5 greenhouse of an American does. Man are created equal and Chinese people have the equal right to emit for their own prosperity

Reminds me of some downplay of China’s progress by looking at averages

Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by toomuchtodo on Saturday August 01, 2020 @05:34PM (#24024079)
Prosperity is not a right. Past emissions by some do not create future emissions allowances for others. We should all be held accountable for future emissions, as the climate cares little for equality concerns.

With that said, it’s entirely feasible to transition faster to not needing to emit carbon to raise or maintain quality of life. As I mention above, everyone should be accountable for that.

Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by ClumsyPilot on Saturday August 01, 2020 @11:57PM (#24026213)
Past emissions allowed countries to build wealth, and if wealthy countriss are failing to clean uo their act, why do you wxpect poorer countries like India or Vietbam to make a sacrafice?
Re:TikTok’s Chinese owner offers to forego stake to clinch U... by whoevercares on Saturday August 01, 2020 @05:42PM (#24024139)
> prosperity is not right

If we directly translate this to Chinese, the statement doesn’t make any sense. Is “pursuing prosperity” a right?

Looks like between the two cultures there might be quite a diverge Of the definition of “right”

Otherwise though I agree with what you said and China probably has been making a good progress already. Believe it or not, low Carbon life style is promoted by the official media