Re:Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action
by yorwba on Saturday August 01, 2020 @08:26AM
(#24019952)
> Bytedance was ordered to suspend its most popular product, a news-aggregator app called Jinri Toutiao (Today’s Headlines). The next day, regulators yanked Neihan Duanzi, the company’s social-media platform, where users share jokes and videos.
If ByteDance really was an extension of the state, surely they wouldn't even have launched a product that violates the regulations of the state they're supposedly an extension of.
Re:Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action
by Jolter on Saturday August 01, 2020 @02:12PM
(#24022635)
You’re missing the parent’s point, which is that they will jump when the government tells them to.
Re:Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action
by christkv on Saturday August 01, 2020 @10:24AM
(#24020631)
They are now as Bytedance for the message and will now do whatever they ask
Re:Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action
by yorwba on Saturday August 01, 2020 @11:12AM
(#24021043)
If a company apologizes for violating regulations and promises to do better, it usually means they made the minimum changes necessary to signal compliance, not that they suddenly changed their ways and will always do as told from then on...
I am not arguing whether or not the US government has the right to ban TikTok, I am explaining what the threats are. Do not conflate the two and confuse the conversation. It is absolutely possible that this is a threat and we can legally (or in compliance with our values) not do anything about it.
“All news media run by the party must work to speak for the party’s will and its propositions, and protect the party’s authority and unity,” - Xi Jinping
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/23/world/asia/china-media-po...
“ On April 9th, the day before Zuckerberg’s testimony began, Bytedance was ordered to suspend its most popular product, a news-aggregator app called Jinri Toutiao (Today’s Headlines). The next day, regulators yanked Neihan Duanzi, the company’s social-media platform, where users share jokes and videos. Last Wednesday, Zhang’s official apology appeared on Weibo, China’s equivalent of Twitter. His company had taken “the wrong path,” he wrote, and, along the way, he had “failed his users.” Perhaps it was not entirely coincidental that his words echoed a notice posted by the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television, the country’s media regulator”
https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/why-china-crack...