I think this view is colored by SV salaries. There are many places where programmers are paid in line with other kinds of skilled labor.
> if IP was abandoned and nobody could make money on software we would all be calling for lawsuits
Doubt it. Quite a few companies already make money on integrating solutions, support and consultancy services.
A great amount of software already has very lax licenses.
But I am not calling for that. I am simply asking for a bit of compassion during an unprecedented situation.
> Just because one medium is easier to pirate
Are you saying books are easier to pirate than software? If so, I have news for you.
> Nearly all libraries already have digital lending programs that are legal and controlled
Quite a few don't or the process is super convoluted, proprietary, requires plugins, mobile apps, Windows only etc.
> IA just distributed pirated copies.
There were certain restrictions in place, like time restrictions, but I guess this shows there's no appeasing the copyright lobby so next time IA might as well place no restrictions on it whatsoever. The backslash is the same.
I’ve never worked in SV
> Are you saying books are easier to pirate than software? If so, I have news for you.
Have you worked in software in the past decade? Everything is run as a service, either entirely online or backed by online services... good luck pirating that.
> Quite a few don't or the process is super convoluted, proprietary, requires plugins, mobile apps, Windows only etc.
As of 2015 90% of libraries had a digital lending program - you have no idea what you are talking about.
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/09/15/who-uses-lib...
> The backslash is the same
Except that again >90% of libraries do it legally without lawsuit because they follow the rules that respect artists and authors.
I am assuming you're from the U.S. Software salaries there are inflated practically everywhere compared to most of the rest of the world.
> As of 2015 90% of libraries had a digital lending program - you have no idea what you are talking about.
It's true that this was maybe 5 years back, (when I was still at uni), but while the option existed, it required some Windows/Mac only SW to decrypt the DRM and the reader itself was way worse in terms of features than literally any PDF reader.
As one form of "protection", you couldn't even highlight text. That is a major part for me to focus on the part I am currently reading and thus made the whole thing practically unusable for me.
I don't think you're quite aware just how awful most of this software is. It's one thing for it being "available" and quite another for it to be a "good experience".
As for me, I rarely use Libby because most of the books I'm looking for do not have digital editions and even if they did no library would bother to pay for the license. (I miss having a research library handy.) In fact, I usually only use it for light audiobooks for road trips, but they usually have so long a waiting list as to make it useless.
Having used the software across three different states recently I have yet to see one that doesn’t let me pull library books right onto my kindle - don’t think I could ask for a better experience.
When I used digital lending, forget Kindle. Forget any kind of "offline" for that matter. Use the proprietary reader app or be out of luck.
(This was in the UK a few years back.)
> Yet even during a pandemic, when visiting a physical library can literally be life threatening
Nearly all libraries already have digital lending programs that are legal and controlled... IA just distributed pirated copies.