News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Haskell Elephant in the Room by chrisseaton on Thursday July 30, 2020 @10:03AM (#23998260)
This is one of those articles that attempts to talk about some situation to make it more common knowledge, but is written in such an incredibly abstract way that all you can really take away from it is 'some unknown people are upset about some unknown issue'.

I feel like this 'elephant in the room' article doesn't tell me what the elephant is, why it's in the room, or why people don't want it to be in the room.

Re:The Haskell Elephant in the Room by gwbas1c on Thursday July 30, 2020 @04:49PM (#24002695)
Just look at the final section, quoted:

> Painfully, some of the very founding contributors to Haskell itself are the ones deepest involved in this ring.

> In this new era the Haskell community itself has simply become a tool to buy legitimacy and pump token values. The reputation of our community is now used to defraud the public and convince non-technical users of the soundness of an utterly unsound investment.

> I have avoided names ... however core Haskell companies such as Well-Typed, Tweag and FP Complete have been deeply complicit in building up this crypto industry for years now.

The article isn't easy to skim, and I think that's the point. The author wants to focus more on why cryptocurrency is a scam, and less on who's guilty.

Re:The Haskell Elephant in the Room by chrisseaton on Thursday July 30, 2020 @05:48PM (#24003220)
Maybe it's just me, but these sentences are so vague and indirect as to mean nothing to me.

I think it's a shame because if you're going to accuse someone of something, at least make your accusation clear and direct so they can respond to it specifically.