News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nano 5.0 by zvrba on Thursday July 30, 2020 @07:16AM (#23996819)
> Now 'nano' is not nano anymore.

Nothing beats plain old 'vi' (NOT vim!).

Re:Nano 5.0 by marcocampos on Thursday July 30, 2020 @08:03AM (#23997096)
Do distros still come with original vi? My understanding is that when you type 'vi' you get a minimal version of vim on most (all?) distros theses days.
Re:Nano 5.0 by zvrba on Thursday July 30, 2020 @09:27AM (#23997845)
'vi' is still 'vi' in OSX, and I believe the "original" 'vi' is accessible as 'nvi' on the usual Linux distros. (e.g., https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/nvi)
Re:Nano 5.0 by fanf2 on Thursday July 30, 2020 @10:05AM (#23998281)
nvi is new vi, released as part of 4.3BSD-net2. The only place I have encountered original vi is on Solaris. Solaris vi does horrible things like crashing if you maximize your xterm too big...
Re:Nano 5.0 by jedimastert on Thursday July 30, 2020 @07:49AM (#23997020)
Can you highlight what differences make you choose vi over vim?
Re:Nano 5.0 by Someone on Thursday July 30, 2020 @08:05AM (#23997113)
I think the comment is about vi scoring better on “lack of features” than vim, not about preferring vi over vim.

Of course, ed beats that, and the combination of cat and echo with redirection beats that (for a very limited definition of ‘editor’)