News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why TechCrunch is over by lachyg on Saturday April 02, 2011 @06:16AM (#2399629)
I found this quote to be pretty good:

"If it was not for MG Siegler (Apple fanboyism aside) and Erick Schonfeld, TechCrunch would be a content-free environment. The rest of the writing has become incredibly self-referential and stale. Paul Carr has the magical ability to consistently write articles that say nothing other than what he did yesterday. Sarah Lacy keeps writing about startups in Indonesia that no one cares about, because even startups in first world countries like France can’t seem to make it. Alexia Tsotsis has no clue about underlying technology or any context but continually injects her opinions and should instead write for PopSugar. Steve Gillmor occasionally adds a rambling grandpa perspective. Robin Wauters, Leena Rao and Jason Kincaid are all competent at summarizing the news, and even add a bit of context, but their content is no different than what you can read elsewhere."

Re:Why TechCrunch is over by mesuvash on Saturday April 02, 2011 @09:25AM (#2399860)
Yeah sometimes i feel TechCrunch is biased. I am not comfortable with people who write news on behalf of some company. We expect them to write the real news rather than supporting some and reprimanding others.
Re:Why TechCrunch is over by cullend on Monday April 04, 2011 @01:01PM (#2407385)
Then you need to readjust your expectations from false idealism to Mike's reality.
Re:Why TechCrunch is over by mesuvash on Tuesday April 05, 2011 @07:42AM (#2410517)
Yeah, i am in verge of adjusting my expectations.