News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Signing .jars is not worth the effort by renewiltord on Sunday July 26, 2020 @02:49PM (#23959207)
Interesting: I wouldn't describe an "append-only" database as "immutable" (after all, you are mutating it by adding things to it) but it appears that the common parlance actually does refer to databases that are append-only as immutable, perhaps as short hand for immutable-entry databases.

Annoys me disproportionately. But the people have spoken.

Re:Signing .jars is not worth the effort by smabie on Sunday July 26, 2020 @08:33PM (#23961254)
Yeah, it's like not you would call an in-memory B-tree immutable if you could only add more nodes but not change existing ones. Clearly other people are wrong and we should stand up for what is right!