Re:Signing .jars is not worth the effort
by renewiltord on Sunday July 26, 2020 @02:49PM
(#23959207)
Interesting: I wouldn't describe an "append-only" database as "immutable" (after all, you are mutating it by adding things to it) but it appears that the common parlance actually does refer to databases that are append-only as immutable, perhaps as short hand for immutable-entry databases.
Annoys me disproportionately. But the people have spoken.
Re:Signing .jars is not worth the effort
by smabie on Sunday July 26, 2020 @08:33PM
(#23961254)
Yeah, it's like not you would call an in-memory B-tree immutable if you could only add more nodes but not change existing ones. Clearly other people are wrong and we should stand up for what is right!
Annoys me disproportionately. But the people have spoken.