By all means, it is falsifiable. We can present some training materials and alter the sleep pattern for a fraction of subjects. If generalization is not more affected than the ability to work with the memorized material, we falsified that.
> We don't even know how the brain does almost anything and you think you can use trendy AI topics to explain something as complex and mysterious as dreams?
With this approach, we can safely quit all science. All in all, it is hubris that a mammal brain can understand the universe.
Insights, ideas, and testable hypotheses offer us a way to make educated guesses. Occasionally they provide a way to understand more.
> Unfalsifiable non-insights
By all means, it is falsifiable. We can present some training materials and alter the sleep pattern for a fraction of subjects. If generalization is not more affected than the ability to work with the memorized material, we falsified that.
> We don't even know how the brain does almost anything and you think you can use trendy AI topics to explain something as complex and mysterious as dreams?
With this approach, we can safely quit all science. All in all, it is hubris that a mammal brain can understand the universe.
Insights, ideas, and testable hypotheses offer us a way to make educated guesses. Occasionally they provide a way to understand more.