Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by lifeformed on Saturday July 25, 2020 @01:32AM
(#23947065)
> Or in other words, about a water molecule per meter every four years.
That still sounds measurable though. Has there been any multiyear experiments that try to measure something like that?
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by SolarNet on Sunday August 02, 2020 @09:28PM
(#24033293)
How? Gravity will make all such changes impossible to measure except at galactic scales.
Again any "new space" doesn't stick around where it was created. The atomic forces, chemical forces, and gravity maintain the system distances we are used to.
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by naveen99 on Friday July 24, 2020 @07:51PM
(#23945648)
Where was gravity when the universe was hot and dense ?
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by metiscus on Friday July 24, 2020 @09:30PM
(#23946145)
Sometime after around 10^-43 seconds apparently is when it started having effects.
https://www.quora.com/When-did-gravity-first-arise-in-the-un...
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015)
by drran on Saturday July 25, 2020 @10:08AM
(#23949280)
At this time, it was denser and heavier than any black hole. Why it didn't collapse back then?
At that rate nearly every other force (from chemical bonds to gravity) prevent anything but the largest cosmological structures (like galaxies) from being effected. They simply continue with their system as they always have, and the extra space shows up as distance between galaxies.