News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015) by SolarNet on Friday July 24, 2020 @06:57PM (#23945331)
Because this expansion is so infinitesimal on that scale as to be negligible. It's about 7%/Gyr, or a billion years for an unbound structure's "space" to grow by 7%. Or about 70 picometers (10^-12) per meter every year. Or in other words, about a water molecule per meter every four years.

At that rate nearly every other force (from chemical bonds to gravity) prevent anything but the largest cosmological structures (like galaxies) from being effected. They simply continue with their system as they always have, and the extra space shows up as distance between galaxies.

Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015) by lifeformed on Saturday July 25, 2020 @01:32AM (#23947065)
> Or in other words, about a water molecule per meter every four years.

That still sounds measurable though. Has there been any multiyear experiments that try to measure something like that?

Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015) by SolarNet on Sunday August 02, 2020 @09:28PM (#24033293)
How? Gravity will make all such changes impossible to measure except at galactic scales.

Again any "new space" doesn't stick around where it was created. The atomic forces, chemical forces, and gravity maintain the system distances we are used to.

Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015) by naveen99 on Friday July 24, 2020 @07:51PM (#23945648)
Where was gravity when the universe was hot and dense ?
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015) by metiscus on Friday July 24, 2020 @09:30PM (#23946145)
Sometime after around 10^-43 seconds apparently is when it started having effects.

https://www.quora.com/When-did-gravity-first-arise-in-the-un...

Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015) by drran on Saturday July 25, 2020 @10:08AM (#23949280)
At this time, it was denser and heavier than any black hole. Why it didn't collapse back then?
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015) by metiscus on Sunday August 02, 2020 @06:22PM (#24032294)
I am going to preface this by saying I'm no scientist. I think it is because the expansion velocity is so high. It would be nice to get a definitive answer.
Re:When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015) by naveen99 on Sunday July 26, 2020 @05:42PM (#23960422)
Also, how is space expanding in time when space is already intertwined with time. Is the block universe expanding in meta time ?