Re:Y Combinator has lost its soul: A YC founder's perspective
by polk on Wednesday July 22, 2020 @11:58AM
(#23918385)
I'm surprised you find the race unnecessary, but continue to include the gender. "Rich people" would be all that's required.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Y Combinator has lost its soul: A YC founder's perspective
by fnordsensei on Wednesday July 22, 2020 @12:30PM
(#23918737)
Isn’t a random sample out of the set of rich people going to yield a lot of whiteness and dudeness though?
Re:Y Combinator has lost its soul: A YC founder's perspective
by kylec on Wednesday July 22, 2020 @12:54PM
(#23918973)
I’m surprised you find the gender unnecessary, but continue to include the species. “Rich individuals” would be all that’s required.
Re:Y Combinator has lost its soul: A YC founder's perspective
by stronglikedan on Wednesday July 22, 2020 @02:11PM
(#23919876)
The term "dudes" is not specific (colloquially, anyway) like "white".
Re:Y Combinator has lost its soul: A YC founder's perspective
by steffandroid on Wednesday July 22, 2020 @12:57PM
(#23919024)
The problem with "rich people" as a phrase is that most rich people don't think of themselves as rich - for example, only 13% of millionaires do [1]. As "white dudes" are disproportionately represented within this demographic, I think the inclusion of these qualifiers helps to illustrate the point.
[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/most-millionaires-dont-think...