Re:Facebook overrides fact-checks when climate science is “o...
by AlexandrB on Tuesday July 21, 2020 @01:36PM
(#23908909)
I disagree. The "algorithm" is fundamentally an optimization problem and companies get to choose what the fitness function for each algorithm is. Facebook chooses "engagement". This is not an accident nor some fundamental property of math. It's a product decision made by a human. One that can be changed.
And there is a fundamental difference between Google's algorithm and Facebook's: control. Google requires user input through search, Facebook decides what shows up when you open the app/site based on an algorithmic feed. In one case the user has some idea that what they're doing is interacting with an algorithm and they can change their search terms if they're not satisfied with the results, in the other the algorithm is in the background making decisions without making itself obvious.
Re:Facebook overrides fact-checks when climate science is “o...
by Gigablah on Wednesday July 22, 2020 @01:35AM
(#23914225)
There is an implicit search on Facebook though, namely the personal information you’ve entered into your profile and your relationships.
Re:Facebook overrides fact-checks when climate science is “o...
by perl4ever on Tuesday July 21, 2020 @10:20PM
(#23913301)
You may be misunderstanding. In this case, I think people conceive of an "obvious" baseline to compare to - presenting posts of your friends in a chronological order.
There's no inherent contradiction when people say "this simple, transparent, obvious algorithm is better". Even if implementing it would in fact result in forgoing billions of dollars.
I personally try to do my part by stomping on this dumb sentiment like a cockroach whenever it pops up.