Re:Any claim without a URI should be treated as suspicious
by klyrs on Monday July 20, 2020 @09:29AM
(#23897582)
> (I'm not sure why the submitter substituted the l for I.)
Sounds like they fell victim to your deliberate trolling. Is that not an expected outcome?
I, for one, am amused at the implication that we should trust an inaccessible file:// link...
Re:Any claim without a URI should be treated as suspicious
by Trufa on Monday July 20, 2020 @09:48AM
(#23897775)
LOL! That's hilarious, love the URl, you could take it a step further with UR1.
Anyway, digged your article, hope I didn't come off as pedantic, thanks for taking it with humor :)
Re:Any claim without a URI should be treated as suspicious
by bradjohnson on Monday July 20, 2020 @11:51AM
(#23899014)
Probably because the blog url does as well: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2020/07/any-claim-without-a-uri-sho...
https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2020/03/it-is-spelled-url/
I usually spell it upper-u upper-r lower-L specifically to annoy both sides of the argument.
(I'm not sure why the submitter substituted the l for I.)