News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by Finnucane on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @12:24PM (#23847503)
Why not just write a blog and post a link to it?
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by masukomi on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @12:53PM (#23847943)
for most people tweeting a link to your blog post is going to get WAY fewer eyeballs on the info you want to convey than you would have if you just put the text directly in twitter.

there's a big difference in how they're consumed. There is still value in blog posts, but sometimes a twitter thread is a web better choice if you want people to see / interact with what you have to say.

Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by jborichevskiy on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @12:58PM (#23848019)
Also, each separate tweet will now have its own distinct discussion threads instead of everything being mixed into one. Certain tweets can be quote retweeted and included in other threads, making exploration even easier.
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by city41 on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @03:49PM (#23850684)
However, it can also be argued this makes following the thread and the generated conversation cumbersome and confusing.
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by jborichevskiy on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @03:59PM (#23850845)
Good point! Here is an interesting tool [0] for this purpose, but it's not ideal for back-and-forth discussion . A step in the right direction though.

https://treeverse.app/view/2eVkxbRl

Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by maps7 on Thursday July 16, 2020 @03:41AM (#23856736)
This doesn't work though. Either stuff is taken out of context or you have to read the whole tweet thread for the context...
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by kossnocorp on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @12:38PM (#23847716)
Threads is an excellent and unique medium that is easy to consume and share, take a look at these examples:

- https://twitter.com/dannypostmaa/status/1282952961857970176

- https://twitter.com/robhope/status/1265278107088347136

Of course, you can make a blog post from such threads (and probably should, if the thread got traction), but it would look and read differently.

Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by andrepd on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @01:10PM (#23848197)
Can you explain why? Your reply is "it's better because it's better".
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by Jetroid on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @01:29PM (#23848491)
From my personal experience, people are more likely to read and share threads for a number of reasons:

* They don't have to go off platform.

* the base tweet can be much more eye catching that a link, even with social cards set up

* People may be desensitised to links that lead off-platform, because that's how Ads generally appear on Twitter

Then there are other advantages, like the fact that it tends to encourage you to write in a concise and direct way, with each tweet in the thread being like a bullet point. I often see people retweeting and engaging with a specific tweet from the thread; it's harder (relative term) to do that with a section from a blog post.

Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by 6510 on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @04:06PM (#23850945)
Depending on what you are doing(!) users stuck on a platform OR users who don't do links might or might not be the desired audience.
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by Jetroid on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @05:05PM (#23851815)
Maybe, but the question is: who are they going to share it to?
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by kossnocorp on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @01:23PM (#23848382)
I never said that threads are better than blog posts. It's a different format and provides its advantages.

- First of all, threads are often long-living i.e., authors update it over time. It allows them to surface the content every time they update it.

- Secondly, often every tweet's a self-containing idea. Blog posts usually are worried and need more time to grasp.

- Also, it's not only easy to consume but also to share.

I like, write and consume both Twitter threads and blog posts.

Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by city41 on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @03:51PM (#23850722)
I think it's primarily because you put actual content right in front of them, increasing the chances of them getting hooked by quite a bit. Before your blog post has any chance of hooking people, they have to first take the plunge of clicking on it. Threads eliminate that friction.
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by Finnucane on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @02:12PM (#23849266)
Those look terrible, like powerpoint presentations that you fall asleep in the middle of. And in any case, the link here was to a tool that was basically using blog-like editing tools to write blog-like threads. So, why not just blog?
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by subsubzero on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @03:06PM (#23850106)
Agreed, what would be better would to maybe put the engagement stats(faves,replies, etc) to the right, expand replies to each tweet when clicked on pop from the right and then descend, but the thread itself a contiguous block of text/tweets all the way to the authors last tweet in the thread.
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by blocked_again on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @02:12PM (#23849267)
If the idea is for no one to read, then yeah, that works.
Re:Show HN: Add what Twitter's missing - good thread editor,... by 6510 on Wednesday July 15, 2020 @04:09PM (#23850992)
I remember when platform farmers started to enforce comments without links on blogs. How almost everyone just bought into that bullshit. Before you could find blogs and blog postings covering the same topics (and/or personal interests) as your own blog, contribute high quality comments and get rewarded with traffic (depending on the quality of your comments) AND you got high quality comments from people who wrote entire blogs about the topic your article covered which was fantastic for the reader.