Re:Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses i...
by usrusr on Tuesday July 14, 2020 @06:41AM
(#23830379)
Not really surprising: in the eyes of a naive regex for extracting email addresses from a string, [email protected] contains a nicely email-looking substring [email protected] but [email protected] isn't contained at all. Spammer address supply chains aren't usually characterized by the highest levels of sophistication.
(Though on the other hand thankfully I'm still not getting much spam anyway and it's only a few addresses that were affected, so I only have a limited amount of data to go by.)