Rust Is Surprisingly Good as a Server Language

Re:Rust Is Surprisingly Good as a Server Language by hellofunk on Monday July 13, 2020 @05:29AM (#23818843)

Just googling “f# compile times” would beg to differ.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rust Is Surprisingly Good as a Server Language by pjmlp on Monday July 13, 2020 @06:12AM (#23819103)

Apparently you didn't bother to read the 3 answers that come up.

Only one of them says anything and it an empty statement like

> F#'s compile times also seem to err on the long side but not very much so, my impression goes.

However it is quite easy to validate write the same algorithm in F# and Rust and then compare.

Ah but Rust is AOT compiled, easy, use NGEN, .NET Native, or Mono AOT for the F# compile time measurements.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rust Is Surprisingly Good as a Server Language by hellofunk on Monday July 13, 2020 @06:58AM (#23819386)

Apparently you assume that everyone’s google results are identical.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rust Is Surprisingly Good as a Server Language by setzer22 on Monday July 13, 2020 @10:06AM (#23820906)

I've had a reviewer in a (scientific) journal tell me some paper is relevant, and thus I need to cite it, because it "appears on their top google results".

People should be educated on the huge bias introduced by personalized services like google.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rust Is Surprisingly Good as a Server Language by chrisoverzero on Monday July 13, 2020 @07:47AM (#23819710)

If that’s the case, then there’s no point in making any claims about what “just googling ‘f# compile times’ ” will reveal.

[ Parent | on HN ]