News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by igammarays on Sunday July 12, 2020 @11:59AM (#23812288)
Long letters are not dead. I have a short list of old friends whom I communicate via the infrequent long email only. These are old acquaintances with whom I have no regular business with, and they have moved far away in life, so short texting conversations are irrelevant. Usually I initiate these "pen pals" by reaching out on Christmas or Eid, several years after we have lost contact, and I make it clear to them that I want to maintain infrequent long correspondence. Usually they are overjoyed and respond with great enthusiasm, as they may have never received or written a long personal letter before in their life. It often has a powerful effect on people. In terms of content, I try to avoid making the letter too personal, because we have been far separated in time and place, sharing only major milestones in life. The fact that I don't use Facebook or any social media at all helps, because people have NOT seen what I've been up to, nor have I seen what they have been doing. I believe the long letter works better than social media -- you can maintain deep, meaningful relationships, with people far away and long ago, with people of the same and opposite gender, without getting involved in the muck of social media.
Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by 317070 on Sunday July 12, 2020 @03:06PM (#23813848)
I'm curious though, what DO you talk about as general topics?
Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by igammarays on Monday July 13, 2020 @11:45AM (#23821992)
Usually a book recommendation that I know jives with their interests or I bring up an old argument I had with them and show how time has lent evidence for/against me.