News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by Aeolun on Sunday July 12, 2020 @01:12AM (#23809015)
In most cases he probably was the smartest person in the room.

If he managed to stay lighthearted and friendly while making fun of others he’s doing a better job than me, because I’ve lost much of my patience for stupidity.

Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by Noos on Sunday July 12, 2020 @09:40AM (#23811212)
he doesn't really have any right to make fun of others, though. Smart people forget that they require a tremendous amount of resources and support to make best use of their intelligence. A director may be a brilliant movie maker, but he needs a whole film company to realize his visions.

A lot of smart people berate others for their stupidity while relying on them for production power and resources to realize their visions or to make money off of them. There needs to be a lot more humility in general about others, especially since in fields like game design, there are way too many smart or skilled people chasing too few supporters/fans, to the point of underpricing the efforts of their labor.

Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by bjornsing on Sunday July 12, 2020 @10:36AM (#23811628)
We smart people can always hire other serfs. ;)

No, sorry. I agree everybody deserves to be treated with respect, but in my experience many people who talk the talk you talk do not walk the walk at all: if they get a chance to crush somebody smarter or more able than themselves many have no limits whatsoever (except avoiding practical consequences to themselves)...

The thing with people like Feynman who are driven by curiosity is that they are not always “super nice”, but they get no joy out of ridiculing or humiliating other people, the way a lot of “small people” do, unfortunately. I’d much prefer being teased by Feynman than being verbally abused by some of the power and money hungry mediocre people I’ve come across.

Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by RcouF1uZ4gsC on Sunday July 12, 2020 @02:04AM (#23809234)
> In most cases he probably was the smartest person in the room.

Excepting the times, of course, when John von Neumann was there.

Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by krick on Sunday July 12, 2020 @03:45AM (#23809631)
In his stories he was. And while it was fun to believe him when I was reading them as a teen, now I'm inclined to take most of it with a huge grain of salt.
Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by watwut on Sunday July 12, 2020 @01:35AM (#23809115)
I don't know. I remember realizing when reading some of his stories, that they are fun to read but I would find that obnoxious/annoying in person.
Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by giantDinosaur on Sunday July 12, 2020 @02:22AM (#23809309)
He seemed to be remarkably charming - so I'm not sure how annoying such behaviour actually would have been.
Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966) by jacobush on Sunday July 12, 2020 @09:07AM (#23811047)
During the encounter you’d perhaps laugh.

Afterwards you’d find yourself dazed and confused, wondering what happened and what steamrolled you in front of everyone.