Should children do more enrichment activities? Correcting for endogeneity

Re:Should children do more enrichment activities? Correcting... by blondin on Saturday July 11, 2020 @10:06PM (#23808072)

this paper is very hard to read and full of jargon for the non-initiated.

the conclusion is just one sentence and is very clear. but i was left with the feeling with all these big words that i am not supposed to understand what they are studying or their methodology...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Should children do more enrichment activities? Correcting... by catalogia on Saturday July 11, 2020 @10:51PM (#23808345)

You're meant to be dazzled by the jargon and trust the Experts™.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Should children do more enrichment activities? Correcting... by 082349872349872 on Sunday July 12, 2020 @01:21AM (#23809054)

It's a normal paper for its discipline. We are not the target audience.

(something that Nature did in the redesign that led to me dropping the subscription —I use "table of contents on the cover" as a sibboleth— was to introduce a section of summaries, written for a wider audience, for some of the articles, which I found, on the contrary, to be a very positive move.)

[ Parent | on HN ]