Re:35% of excess deaths from pandemic not caused by Covid-19
by guscost on Friday July 10, 2020 @10:55AM
(#23792083)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/patients-with-heart-at...
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1931
https://agoodwar.com/the-ban-on-elective-procedures-is-killi...
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/a-tale-of-two-epidemics-...
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/...
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/295664
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/may/14/isolated-uk-...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/13/hospit...
https://www.businessinsider.com/school-closures-may-not-prev...
Re:35% of excess deaths from pandemic not caused by Covid-19
by happytoexplain on Friday July 10, 2020 @11:11AM
(#23792276)
This appears to just be articles about examples of the harm of the lockdown, which isn't what I asked about, nor did I deny it. Another person could just as easily post examples of the direct harm of the virus and call it "descending into chaos" because we didn't lock down enough. The point is to be rational.
Re:35% of excess deaths from pandemic not caused by Covid-19
by guscost on Friday July 10, 2020 @11:23AM
(#23792430)
Those effects don't amount to "general chaos" when compared to a normal flu season? I'll admit it's a little hyperbolic, as is my style.
But in many parts of the country (mostly the parts where HN users don't live, naturally), "general chaos" is already not hyperbole: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/06/upshot/murders-rising-cri...
Edit: For context, I admit the devastation to life from both "sides". But I have no strong conclusion either way - I can't figure out if we're erring on too much lockdown or too little lockdown so far.