News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Neural programmer better than Quicksort by hutzlibu on Friday July 10, 2020 @06:29AM (#23789983)
Tests are simple to unterstand.

Complicated proofs I do not understand, without much effort.

And I surely know that you can make mistakes with test cases as well. So I surely do not claim my way to be superior. But it works way better for me.

Re:Neural programmer better than Quicksort by eru on Friday July 10, 2020 @09:39AM (#23791346)
Test cases are not necessarily simple to understand.

Especially the test cases needed to trigger some deep bug.

Re:Neural programmer better than Quicksort by gnufx on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:13PM (#23795900)
And so aphyr gets paid, for instance. You may not even be able realistically to run a test case. The laws of life say your 10000 core compute job will fail non-deterministically only after a day or so. It would clearly be helpful to have at least some formal guarantees, such as liveness at some level.