Re:Mozilla letter to Amazon Ring: stop sharing information w...
by ponker on Friday July 10, 2020 @03:05AM
(#23788950)
I do not feel that "Cops are natural aggressors" needs further litigation but agree on the rest. However, how do you find Ring cameras protect your packages from theft? Do package thieves notice the camera and avoid your house, or do you send the video to the police who find the person based on their appearance or vehicle? If the former, why does the camera need to even be functional? And if the latter, why is the "cloud" necessary compared to a Ubiquiti style camera, or if you prefer a cloud camera, one from a company other than Ring who has shown extreme eagnerness to use close relationships with law enforcement as a form of marketing?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mozilla letter to Amazon Ring: stop sharing information w...
by SpicyLemonZest on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:04AM
(#23789240)
I'm a bit confused by the question. Why should people buying home security products see a close relationship with law enforcement as a negative?
Re:Mozilla letter to Amazon Ring: stop sharing information w...
by morsch on Friday July 10, 2020 @08:21AM
(#23790753)
You have just repeated their question in the negative without answering it. Apparently everybody has an answer they find self-evident despite it being opposite. Also, there were other questions. (I'm aware you are not the OP.)